GLW
Daily closes · 1Y (252 sessions) · +154.7% · range 64.52–255.69
The Businesswhat the company reports
Business & cash flow
| OCF / assets | 8.7% |
|---|---|
| FCF / revenue | 17.2% |
| Gross margin | 36.4% |
| ROIC | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 38.8 |
This company does not report capital expenditure in the standard filing tag, so free cash flow cannot be derived and FCF/assets is not shown — common for asset managers, REITs, insurers and utilities. OCF/assets is shown instead, and it is the other measure Brown Bear's testing found to survive. Assets are from the latest annual filing (FY2025).
Price vs Earnings growth
Price has run ahead of forward EPS growth by 65.2pp
Confidence 95.0/100
Drivers
| Forward EPS growth | +89.5% |
|---|---|
| Trailing price return (1y) | +154.7% |
| Forward P/E compression | +47.2% |
Figures
| Trailing EPS | 2.28 |
|---|---|
| Forward EPS | 4.32 |
| Trailing P/E | 73.44 |
| Forward P/E | 38.75 |
Revisions
Stable (+0.4%, 10 dates)
Takeaway Price has moved further than forward earnings growth currently justifies — worth weighing against the rest of the entry case.
Reported earnings
Revenue Net incomeEPS (GAAP) (-0.14–0.62, own scale) Derived Q4
12 quarters to Q1 26. Revenue and net income share one scale, so the gap between them is the margin. The baseline is zero — bars below it are losses. The line is GAAP EPS — it spans every quarter shown, where the reported figure only goes back as far as the consensus feed does.
| Quarter ending | Revenue | YoY | Net income | EPS (GAAP) | EPS reported | vs consensus | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-31 | 4.14bn | +20.0% | 371.00m | 0.43 | 0.70 | +0.5% | 2026-05-01 |
| 2025-12-31 (derived) | 4.21bn | +20.4% | 540.00m | 0.62 | 0.72 | +1.1% | 2026-02-12 |
| 2025-09-30 | 4.10bn | +20.9% | 430.00m | 0.50 | 0.67 | -0.0% | 2025-10-31 |
| 2025-06-30 | 3.86bn | +18.8% | 469.00m | 0.54 | — | — | 2025-08-01 |
| 2025-03-31 | 3.45bn | +16.0% | 157.00m | 0.18 | — | — | 2025-05-02 |
| 2024-12-31 (derived) | 3.50bn | +16.9% | 310.00m | 0.36 | — | — | 2025-02-13 |
| 2024-09-30 | 3.39bn | +6.9% | -117.00m | -0.14 | — | — | 2024-11-01 |
| 2024-06-30 | 3.25bn | +0.2% | 104.00m | 0.12 | — | — | 2024-08-02 |
| 2024-03-31 | 2.98bn | — | 209.00m | 0.24 | — | — | 2024-05-02 |
| 2023-12-31 (derived) | 2.99bn | — | -40.00m | -0.05 | — | — | 2024-02-12 |
| 2023-09-30 | 3.17bn | — | 164.00m | 0.19 | — | — | 2023-10-30 |
| 2023-06-30 | 3.24bn | — | 281.00m | 0.33 | — | — | 2023-07-27 |
Earnings response
| Typical move around a filing | ±1.2% |
|---|---|
| On an ordinary two days | ±1.5% — filings move it 0.8× as much |
| Direction | 6 up, 5 down over 11 filings |
Revenue up year on year Revenue down Price move around the filing separate scales — a crossing means nothing
| Quarter ending | Filed | Revenue YoY | Move around filing | Next 20 sessions vs SPY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-31 | 2026-05-01 | +20.0% | -2.6% | +19.7% |
| 2025-09-30 | 2025-10-31 | +20.9% | -3.1% | -3.7% |
| 2025-06-30 | 2025-08-01 | +18.8% | +0.4% | +6.8% |
| 2025-03-31 | 2025-05-02 | +16.0% | +1.4% | +6.7% |
| 2024-09-30 | 2024-11-01 | +6.9% | -1.2% | -0.8% |
| 2024-06-30 | 2024-08-02 | +0.2% | -5.7% | +1.7% |
| 2024-03-31 | 2024-05-02 | -6.4% | +0.7% | +8.4% |
| 2023-09-30 | 2023-10-30 | -9.0% | +0.6% | -2.2% |
| 2023-06-30 | 2023-07-27 | -10.3% | -1.9% | -0.2% |
| 2023-03-31 | 2023-04-28 | -13.6% | +1.1% | -6.2% |
| 2022-09-30 | 2022-10-27 | -3.5% | +0.3% | +1.0% |
Share count
Diluted shares Return since the previous filing
| Direction | Flat — little net change |
|---|---|
| Diluted shares | 871.0M as at 2026-03-31 |
| Change over 1 year | +0.6% |
| Change over 3 years | +1.4% |
| Public float | $45.00bn as at 2025-06-30 (10-K) |
The Pricewhat the chart is doingTop ↑
Price Levels
| Strategy | Current Price Reasonable |
|---|---|
| Reference band | 164.93 — 169.11 |
| Protective stop | 143.03 (Atr, 14.4% risk) |
| Support | 147.56 (2 touches, 13.5% away) |
| Resistance | 177.92 (6.3% away) |
Takeaway The shares are nearer the ceiling than the floor: about 6.3% below 177.92, where sellers have turned up before, and 13.5% above 147.56, where buyers have stepped in before. That floor has held 2 times, which is how it was spotted. If someone bought at today's price and sold if it dropped through the level below, they would be about 14.4% out of pocket. That is all this figure means — an illustration of the risk, not a price to sell at.
Levels are computed from price structure. They describe where the engine locates support and extension — they are not targets, and not advice.
Ichimoku Cloud (Adaptive)
| Daily cloud | Price INSIDE the cloud | periods 7/19/38 (73% of classic 9/26/52) |
|---|---|
| Lines | Tenkan/Kijun BULL (fresh up cross, 4d ago) | cloud twist BEAR |
| Cloud thickness | 89% percentile (thick — substantial structure) |
| Chikou span | Above price from 26 periods ago |
| Weekly cloud | Price INSIDE the weekly cloud (context only, not scored) |
Takeaway The stock is trading inside its cloud — a shaded band drawn from several of its own moving averages, currently 154.48 to 193.14. Inside the band those averages disagree with each other, so the indicator is not saying much either way. Its shorter-term averages point the other way, so this is a mixed reading rather than a clear one. The band is unusually wide at the moment, so it marks a broad zone rather than a single level.
Trailing returns
| 21 days | -10.8% |
|---|---|
| 63 days | -15.5% |
| 126 days | +30.7% |
| 252 days | +157.7% |
| Below 252d high | 34.5% |
Trend context
| Position | Far above trend |
|---|---|
| Extension | Extremely extended |
| Trend slope | Rising |
| Direction of travel | Diverging from trend |
Takeaway Extreme upside extension is still moving away from fair trend; chase risk is elevated.
Volatility
| State | No recent compression |
|---|---|
| Current band width | 32.4% of price |
| Recent tightest | 32.4% (0 sessions ago, narrower than 58.0% of its history) |
| Expansion since | 1.00× |
| Band | 126.66 — 175.60 |
Takeaway Lately this share price has been swinging around inside a range roughly 32% wide. That is normal for this stock, so there is nothing unusual to read into it either way.
Historical trends
History begins when the site started recording, not when the company listed, so a short line means a short record and nothing more.
Who's Tradingthe flow behind the priceTop ↑
Insider activity
| Activity | No filings in the window |
|---|---|
| Buy filings | 0 |
| Sell filings | 0 |
Open-market Form 4 purchases and sales over the last 75 days, read from SEC EDGAR Form 4. Grants, option exercises, gifts and shares withheld for tax are excluded — they are compensation mechanics, not a decision to buy or sell. Reported Form 4 activity. Brown Bear tested insider cluster-buying as a return signal and rejected it as era-unstable; shown as fact, not signal.
Volume confirmation
| Volume-price trend | Above its signal line |
|---|---|
| Confirmation | Marginal |
No absorption or distribution event in the recent window.
Takeaway Slightly more shares change hands on rising days than on falling ones, but the gap is too small to read anything into.
Options Positioning
No binary-event flag
GLW: no binary-event flag. Near IV 71%, far IV 69% (ratio 1.02), implied move 8.9%.
| Implied volatility | 71% near (9d) · 69% far (65d) |
|---|---|
| Term structure | 1.02× near/far |
| Historical volatility | 92% |
| Implied vs historical | 0.77× |
| Implied move | ±8.9% by 2026-08-21 |
| Implied move vs ATR | 0.52× |
| Skew | Flat (0.96×) |
| Call wall | 200.00 (+19.4% away) |
| Put wall | 140.00 (-16.4% away) |
| Gamma pin | 160.00 |
Takeaway Insuring against a move in this stock costs less for the next few weeks than for the next few months, which is the normal state of affairs and suggests no particular date is worrying anyone. Options traders are positioned for a move of around 8.9% in either direction by 2026-08-21.
Chain as at 2026-08-12. This is a risk read on whether a specific event is being priced — not a directional view.
Context & Methodthe record, and how it was builtTop ↑
Relative Rotation
Stock Leadership Confirmed
Rotation health 100.0/100; Strong Rotation Tailwind.
| Rotation health | 100.0 |
|---|---|
| Rotation strength | 65.4 |
| Leg | Quadrant | RS-Ratio | RS-Mom |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock vs sector | Leading | 102.4 | 115.2 |
| Stock vs SPY | Leading | 103.6 | 113.4 |
| Sector vs SPY | Leading | 113.6 | 115.9 |
Direction of travel: North-East / strengthening leadership
Position only. Brown Bear's RRG redesign programme is closed — five constructions, none beat an appropriate null — so this section describes where the name sits, and is not a signal.
News Headlines
- Loading headlines\u2026
Headlines are supplied by third-party feeds and are not written, ranked or interpreted by Brown Bear. They feed no score on this page.
Detailed Scoring
Positive signals
- Piotroski F-score 5/9 (+5.0)
- Altman Z-score 6.03 (+6.0)
- Insider conviction score (+3.0)
- Gross margin quality: 36.4% (+1.6)
- ROIC quality: 9.4% (+1.3)
- FCF margin quality: 17.2% (+5.2)
- High earnings quality (accrual ratio -0.035) (+1.0)
- Track 2: MACD histogram state (3.92) (+12.0)
- Track 2: MACD line/signal trend quality (+15.0)
- Track 2: MACD slope expanding (+8.0)
- Track 2: relative strength trend improving (+10.0)
- Track 2: 20-day momentum acceleration 0.03 (+4.0)
- Track 2: ADX 33.4 and falling (+8.0)
- Track 2: relative momentum rank 0.97 (+15.0)
- Track 2: price above EMA20 by 5.2% (+4.4)
- Track 2: EMA20 slope expanding 1.1% (+2.9)
- Track 2: MACD histogram acceleration 2.44 (+12.0)
- Track 2: RSI trend quality 55.8, 5-day change +6.7 (+5.4)
- Track 2: Bollinger position 0.83 (+6.7)
Negative signals
- Track 2: negative MACD regime (-8.0)
- Track 2: weak volume for momentum setup (0.57x average)
- Track 2: bearish DI spread (-1.1)
- Track 2: weak VPT confirmation (0.00)
- Track 2: price below EMA50 by 0.5%
- Track 2: EMA50 slope deteriorating -3.6%
- Track 2 structural exemption: structural score 23.1/100 below the 25 quality floor; this is an unowned speculative candidate, so the universal SELL gate was skipped and the Track 2 momentum/RRG grid was allowed to evaluate instead. Structural quality here is weak by design for this kind of candidate -- treat any resulting BUY as higher risk than a Track 1 signal.
Chase risk is not elevated for this name, so extension penalties are omitted from the negative signals above.