IONQ

IonQ ·Technology
42.22 live · 2026-08-27 14:54

Structural scoring is not meaningful for this business

Structural scoring uses gross margin, free cash flow and Altman Z — measures built for operating companies. For banks, insurers and asset managers they produce artifacts, because the cash-flow statement is dominated by lending and deposit flows rather than operations. Treat the structural and composite figures below as not comparable with other sectors, in either direction.

  • Reported free cash flow is far outside the range an operating business can show, indicating balance-sheet rather than operating flows
7.5% not comparable
Brown Bear Score
19.0% not comparable
Business Conviction Score
26.6%
Position Health Score
0.0%
Chase Risk
Daily closes

Daily closes · 1Y (252 sessions) · -1.8% · range 26.59–82.09

Score trends appear once the scores have been recorded on more than one trading day.

The Businesswhat the company reports

Business & cash flow

FCF / assets -4.6%
OCF / assets -4.3%
FCF / revenue -217.8%
Gross margin 36.1%
ROIC -9.9%
Forward P/E -33.0

FCF/assets and OCF/assets are the cash-flow measures Brown Bear's own testing found to survive; FCF/revenue is shown alongside for context. Assets are from the latest annual filing (FY2025).

Price vs Earnings growth

Trailing EPS is negative (-3.68) and forward EPS is not positive, so a growth percentage does not exist

Confidence 35.0/100

Takeaway Low data confidence (limited analyst coverage) — treat this section as informational only.

Reported earnings

Next report 2026-11-03 · consensus EPS -0.32

Q1 23 revenue: 4.29mQ1 23 net income: -27.34mQ1 23 EPS: -0.14Q2 23 revenue: 5.51mQ2 23 net income: -43.72mQ2 23 EPS: -0.22Q2 23Q3 23 revenue: 6.14mQ3 23 net income: -44.81mQ3 23 EPS: -0.22Q4 23 revenue: 6.11mQ4 23 net income: -41.90mQ4 23 EPS: -0.21Q4 23Q1 24 revenue: 7.58mQ1 24 net income: -39.59mQ1 24 EPS: -0.19Q2 24 revenue: 11.38mQ2 24 net income: -37.56mQ2 24 EPS: -0.18Q2 24Q3 24 revenue: 12.40mQ3 24 net income: -52.50mQ3 24 EPS: -0.24Q4 24 revenue: 11.71mQ4 24 net income: -202.00mQ4 24 EPS: -0.95Q4 24Q1 25 revenue: 7.57mQ1 25 net income: -32.25mQ1 25 EPS: -0.14Q2 25 revenue: 20.69mQ2 25 net income: -176.84mQ2 25 EPS: -0.70Q2 25Q3 25 revenue: 39.87mQ3 25 net income: -1.05bnQ3 25 EPS: -3.58Q1 26 revenue: 64.67mQ1 26 net income: 805.36mQ1 26 EPS: 2.17Q1 26

Revenue Net incomeEPS (GAAP) (-3.58–2.17, own scale) Derived Q4

12 quarters to Q1 26. Revenue and net income share one scale, so the gap between them is the margin. The baseline is zero — bars below it are losses. The line is GAAP EPS — it spans every quarter shown, where the reported figure only goes back as far as the consensus feed does.

Quarter endingRevenueYoY Net incomeEPS (GAAP) Filed
2026-03-31 64.67m +754.7% 805.36m 2.17 2026-05-07
2025-09-30 39.87m +221.5% -1.05bn -3.58 2025-11-05
2025-06-30 20.69m +81.8% -176.84m -0.70 2025-08-06
2025-03-31 7.57m -0.2% -32.25m -0.14 2025-05-07

Share count

Diluted shares over time

Diluted shares Return since the previous filing

Direction Growing — shares issued
Diluted shares 371.2M as at 2026-03-31
Change over 1 year +62.3%
Change over 3 years +85.5%
Public float $11.50bn as at 2025-06-30 (10-K)

History before 2022-03-31 is not shown. The share count jumps at that date by a ratio no ordinary issuance produces — a split whose factor is not in Brown Bear's split store — so earlier figures are on a different basis and cannot be compared with today's.

The Pricewhat the chart is doingTop ↑

Price Levels

StrategyFair Value Anchor
Reference band 39.39 — 40.58
Protective stop 33.30 (Atr, 16.7% risk)
Support 30.22 (3 touches, 32.5% away)
Resistance 41.98 (4.9% away)

Takeaway The shares are nearer the ceiling than the floor: about 4.9% below 41.98, where sellers have turned up before, and 32.5% above 30.22, where buyers have stepped in before. That floor has held 3 times, which is how it was spotted. If someone bought at today's price and sold if it dropped through the level below, they would be about 16.7% out of pocket. That is all this figure means — an illustration of the risk, not a price to sell at.

Levels are computed from price structure. They describe where the engine locates support and extension — they are not targets, and not advice.

Ichimoku Cloud (Adaptive)

Daily cloudPrice BELOW the cloud | periods 8/22/44 (84% of classic 9/26/52)
LinesTenkan/Kijun BULL | cloud twist BEAR
Cloud eventFresh down breakout 0d ago
Cloud thickness11% percentile (thin — little structure to fight through)
Chikou spanAbove price from 26 periods ago
Weekly cloudPrice BELOW the weekly cloud (context only, not scored)

Takeaway The stock is trading below its cloud — a shaded band drawn from several of its own moving averages, currently 40.73 to 43.44. Being below it means the medium-term picture is pointing downwards, and that band is the first hurdle it would have to climb back through. Its shorter-term averages point the other way, so this is a mixed reading rather than a clear one.

Trailing returns

21 days +18.2%
63 days -38.8%
126 days +19.2%
252 days +3.5%
Below 252d high51.2%

Trend context

PositionAt trend
ExtensionNormal
Trend slopeRising
Direction of travelConverging back to trend

Takeaway Price is near a rising Kalman fair trend, consistent with a healthy trend setup.

Volatility

State In a squeeze
Current band width29.0% of price
Recent tightest29.0% (0 sessions ago, narrower than 97.0% of its history)
Expansion since1.00×
Band 36.05 — 48.26

Takeaway Lately this share price has been swinging around inside a range roughly 29% wide, and it recently went unusually quiet — calmer than it has been 97% of the time. When a stock goes quiet like this, its next move tends to look big by comparison. But quiet says nothing about which way it will go: Brown Bear tested calm-before-a-move as a reason to buy, and it did not work.

Repair Pathway

  1. Nearest Trigger MACD bullish crossover repair trigger repair engine identifies this as the nearest technical repair catalyst · Broadly stable
  2. Trigger 2 MACD histogram above zero 0.06 gap is broadly stable · Broadly stable
  3. Trigger 3 Bollinger recovery toward mid-band +0.12 band position price remains in the lower Bollinger zone; recovery toward mid-band would support repair · Broadly stable
  4. Trigger 4 MACD histogram acceleration turns positive secondary repair secondary repair catalyst could add confirmation if the primary trigger develops · Broadly stable
  5. Trigger 5 Volume confirmation above 1.5x +0.50x volume confirmation would improve confidence in the pathway · Broadly stable

Who's Tradingthe flow behind the priceTop ↑

Insider activity

ActivityInsider selling
Buy filings0
Sell filings3
Shares sold9,329
Value sold$513.2k
Latest sell2026-06-18
FiledInsiderSharesValue
2026-06-18 Sold TOLEDANO GABRIELLE BDirector 2,757 $151,663
2026-06-18 Sold Chou Kathryn K.Director 2,757 $151,690

Open-market Form 4 purchases and sales over the last 75 days, read from SEC EDGAR Form 4. Grants, option exercises, gifts and shares withheld for tax are excluded — they are compensation mechanics, not a decision to buy or sell. Reported Form 4 activity. Brown Bear tested insider cluster-buying as a return signal and rejected it as era-unstable; shown as fact, not signal.

Volume confirmation

Volume-price trend Above its signal line
Confirmation Marginal

No absorption or distribution event in the recent window.

Takeaway Slightly more shares change hands on rising days than on falling ones, but the gap is too small to read anything into.

Options Positioning

No binary-event flag

IONQ: no binary-event flag. Near IV 77%, far IV 81% (ratio 0.94), implied move 9.0%.

Implied volatility 77% near (8d) · 81% far (85d)
Term structure 0.94× near/far
Historical volatility 85%
Implied vs historical 0.90×
Implied move ±9.0% by 2026-09-04
Implied move vs ATR 0.54×
Skew Flat (0.93×)
Call wall 50.00 (+18.4% away)
Put wall 28.00 (-33.7% away)
Gamma pin 50.00

Takeaway Insuring against a move in this stock costs less for the next few weeks than for the next few months, which is the normal state of affairs and suggests no particular date is worrying anyone. Options traders are positioned for a move of around 9.0% in either direction by 2026-09-04.

Chain as at 2026-08-27. This is a risk read on whether a specific event is being priced — not a directional view.

Context & Methodthe record, and how it was builtTop ↑

Relative Rotation

ImprovingLeadingLaggingWeakeningvs sectorvs SPYsector vs SPYRS-Ratio →RS-Momentum →

Sector Headwind / Stock Mixed

Rotation health 39.0/100; Negative Rotation.

Rotation health 39.0
Rotation strength 79.5
LegQuadrantRS-RatioRS-Mom
Stock vs sector Weakening 109.7 82.9
Stock vs SPY Weakening 109.2 81.8
Sector vs SPY Weakening 103.8 79.2

Direction of travel: South-West / deteriorating rotation

Position only. Brown Bear's RRG redesign programme is closed — five constructions, none beat an appropriate null — so this section describes where the name sits, and is not a signal.

News Headlines

  1. Loading headlines\u2026

Headlines are supplied by third-party feeds and are not written, ranked or interpreted by Brown Bear. They feed no score on this page.

Detailed Scoring

Positive signals

  • Piotroski F-score 4/9 (+3.0)
  • Altman Z-score 3.89 (+3.0)
  • Insider conviction score (+3.0)
  • Gross margin quality: 36.1% (+1.6)
  • ROIC improving by 39.3 pts (+3.0)
  • FCF margin improving by 27.6 pts (+2.0)
  • High earnings quality (accrual ratio -0.035) (+1.0)
  • Relative Strength 7.9% vs sector: OUTPERFORMING (+9.5)
  • Track 2: relative strength trend improving (+9.5)
  • Track 2: 20-day momentum acceleration 0.65 (+30.2)
  • Track 2: bullish DI spread 3.8 (+2.9)
  • Track 2: ADX 49.6 and flat (+14.3)
  • Track 2: VPT strength 0.00 (+0.1)
  • Track 2: Bollinger position 0.33 (+2.5)

Negative signals

  • Track 2: weak MACD line/signal structure (-7.0)
  • Track 2: weak volume for momentum setup (0.66x average)
  • Weak relative momentum rank (0.41)
  • Track 2: price below EMA20 by 5.0%
  • Track 2: EMA20 slope deteriorating -0.6%
  • Track 2: MACD histogram deteriorating (-1.04)
  • Track 2: RSI deterioration/overheating 50.6, 5-day change -16.1
  • Track 2: price below EMA50 by 8.2%
  • Track 2: EMA50 slope deteriorating -0.3%
  • Gross margin improving by -16.1 pts (+-0.9)
  • Track 2 structural exemption: structural score 15.7/100 below the 25 quality floor; this is an unowned speculative candidate, so the universal SELL gate was skipped and the Track 2 momentum/RRG grid was allowed to evaluate instead. Structural quality here is weak by design for this kind of candidate -- treat any resulting BUY as higher risk than a Track 1 signal.

Chase risk is not elevated for this name, so extension penalties are omitted from the negative signals above.