JOBY
Structural scoring is not meaningful for this business
Structural scoring uses gross margin, free cash flow and Altman Z — measures built for operating companies. For banks, insurers and asset managers they produce artifacts, because the cash-flow statement is dominated by lending and deposit flows rather than operations. Treat the structural and composite figures below as not comparable with other sectors, in either direction.
- Reported free cash flow is far outside the range an operating business can show, indicating balance-sheet rather than operating flows
Some scores are at the bottom of their range
This score sits at the bottom of the 0–100 range. The underlying calculation was negative, so the displayed value is a floor, not a measurement of zero.
- Tactical Score: displayed 0, underlying value -57.6
Daily closes · 1Y (252 sessions) · -51.5% · range 6.65–19.57
The Businesswhat the company reports
Business & cash flow
| FCF / assets | -31.4% |
|---|---|
| OCF / assets | -28.4% |
| FCF / revenue | -954.4% |
| Gross margin | 38.0% |
| ROIC | -41.5% |
| Forward P/E | -11.1 |
FCF/assets and OCF/assets are the cash-flow measures Brown Bear's own testing found to survive; FCF/revenue is shown alongside for context. Assets are from the latest annual filing (FY2025).
Price vs Earnings growth
Trailing EPS is negative (-0.97) and forward EPS is not positive, so a growth percentage does not exist
Confidence 35.0/100
Drivers
| Trailing price return (1y) | -51.5% |
|---|
Figures
| Trailing EPS | -0.97 |
|---|---|
| Forward EPS | -0.65 |
| Forward P/E | -11.07 |
Takeaway Low data confidence (limited analyst coverage) — treat this section as informational only.
Reported earnings
Revenue Net incomeEPS (GAAP) (-0.48–0.00, own scale) Derived Q4
10 quarters to Q1 26. Revenue and net income share one scale, so the gap between them is the margin. The baseline is zero — bars below it are losses. The line is GAAP EPS — it spans every quarter shown, where the reported figure only goes back as far as the consensus feed does.
| Quarter ending | Revenue | YoY | Net income | EPS (GAAP) | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-31 | 24.25m | — | -109.95m | -0.12 | 2026-05-06 |
| 2025-09-30 | 22.57m | +80,521.4% | -401.23m | -0.48 | 2025-11-06 |
| 2025-06-30 | 15.00k | -46.4% | -324.67m | -0.41 | 2025-08-07 |
| 2025-03-31 | 0 | -100.0% | -82.41m | -0.11 | 2025-05-08 |
| 2024-09-30 | 28.00k | — | -143.88m | -0.21 | 2024-11-06 |
| 2024-06-30 | 28.00k | — | -123.29m | -0.18 | 2024-08-08 |
| 2024-03-31 | 25.00k | — | -94.59m | -0.14 | 2024-05-08 |
| 2023-09-30 | 0 | — | 1.52m | 0.00 | 2024-11-06 |
| 2023-06-30 | 0 | — | -286.08m | -0.45 | 2024-08-08 |
| 2023-03-31 | 0 | — | -113.39m | -0.19 | 2024-05-08 |
Share count
Diluted shares Return since the previous filing
| Direction | Growing — shares issued |
|---|---|
| Diluted shares | 943.5M as at 2026-03-31 |
| Change over 1 year | +23.0% |
| Change over 3 years | +55.9% |
| Public float | $5.63bn as at 2025-06-30 (10-K) |
History before 2022-03-31 is not shown. The share count jumps at that date by a ratio no ordinary issuance produces — a split whose factor is not in Brown Bear's split store — so earlier figures are on a different basis and cannot be compared with today's.
The Pricewhat the chart is doingTop ↑
Price Levels
| Strategy | Current Price Reasonable |
|---|---|
| Reference band | 7.03 — 7.21 |
| Protective stop | 6.72 (Structure, 5.7% risk) |
| Support | 6.91 (2 touches, 3.3% away) |
| Resistance | 9.14 (28.0% away) |
Takeaway The shares are nearer the floor than the ceiling: about 3.3% above 6.91, a price buyers have stepped in at before, and 28.0% below 9.14, where sellers have turned up before. That floor has held 2 times, which is how it was spotted. If someone bought at today's price and sold if it dropped through the level below, they would be about 5.7% out of pocket. That is all this figure means — an illustration of the risk, not a price to sell at.
Levels are computed from price structure. They describe where the engine locates support and extension — they are not targets, and not advice.
Ichimoku Cloud (Adaptive)
| Daily cloud | Price BELOW the cloud | periods 9/25/50 (97% of classic 9/26/52) |
|---|---|
| Lines | Tenkan/Kijun BEAR (fresh down cross, 3d ago) | cloud twist BEAR |
| Cloud thickness | 56% percentile |
| Chikou span | Not clear of price from 26 periods ago |
| Weekly cloud | Price BELOW the weekly cloud (context only, not scored) |
Takeaway The stock is trading below its cloud — a shaded band drawn from several of its own moving averages, currently 7.74 to 8.46. Being below it means the medium-term picture is pointing downwards, and that band is the first hurdle it would have to climb back through. Its shorter-term averages agree with that.
Trailing returns
| 21 days | -1.8% |
|---|---|
| 63 days | -37.8% |
| 126 days | -27.3% |
| 252 days | -50.1% |
| Below 252d high | 63.5% |
Trend context
| Position | Below trend |
|---|---|
| Extension | Normal |
| Trend slope | Falling sharply |
| Direction of travel | Diverging from trend |
Takeaway Kalman fair trend is falling sharply; downside trend risk remains elevated.
Volatility
| State | No recent compression |
|---|---|
| Current band width | 25.8% of price |
| Recent tightest | 25.8% (0 sessions ago, narrower than 62.0% of its history) |
| Expansion since | 1.00× |
| Band | 6.78 — 8.79 |
Takeaway Lately this share price has been swinging around inside a range roughly 26% wide. That is normal for this stock, so there is nothing unusual to read into it either way.
Historical trends
History begins when the site started recording, not when the company listed, so a short line means a short record and nothing more.
Repair Pathway
- Nearest Trigger RSI recovery above 50 repair trigger repair engine identifies this as the nearest technical repair catalyst · Deteriorating rapidly
- Trigger 2 Relative momentum rank back above 0.45 secondary repair secondary repair catalyst could add confirmation if the primary trigger develops · Broadly stable
- Trigger 3 Volume confirmation above 1.5x +0.50x volume confirmation would improve confidence in the pathway · Broadly stable
- Trigger 4 MACD histogram above zero 0.07 gap is deteriorating · Broadly stable
- Trigger 5 MACD bullish crossover line/signal spread gap is deteriorating · Broadly stable
Who's Tradingthe flow behind the priceTop ↑
Insider activity
| Activity | Insider selling |
|---|---|
| Buy filings | 0 |
| Sell filings | 11 |
| Shares sold | 1,332,206 |
| Value sold | $10.4m |
| Latest sell | 2026-08-25 |
| Filed | Insider | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-25 | Sold Bowles GregoryChief Policy Officer | 4,575 | $33,077 |
| 2026-08-24 | Sold Bowles GregoryChief Policy Officer | 3,531 | $25,918 |
| 2026-08-17 | Sold Bevirt JoeBenCEO and Chief Architect | 596,667 | $4,695,769 |
| 2026-08-13 | Sold Sciarra Paul CahillDirector | 62,500 | $497,500 |
| 2026-07-15 | Sold Bevirt JoeBenCEO and Chief Architect | 596,666 | $4,624,162 |
| 2026-07-14 | Sold DeHoff KateSee Remarks | 14,240 | $110,075 |
Open-market Form 4 purchases and sales over the last 75 days, read from SEC EDGAR Form 4. Grants, option exercises, gifts and shares withheld for tax are excluded — they are compensation mechanics, not a decision to buy or sell. Reported Form 4 activity. Brown Bear tested insider cluster-buying as a return signal and rejected it as era-unstable; shown as fact, not signal.
Volume confirmation
| Volume-price trend | Below its signal line |
|---|---|
| Confirmation | Marginal |
No absorption or distribution event in the recent window.
Takeaway The heaviest trading has been happening on days when the price falls: when large numbers of shares change hands, the price has tended to go down rather than up. That tells you where the weight of trading has been. It does not tell you what happens next, and it is not a signal to sell.
Options Positioning
No binary-event flag
JOBY: no binary-event flag. Near IV 60%, far IV 70% (ratio 0.85), implied move 7.1%.
| Implied volatility | 60% near (8d) · 70% far (85d) |
|---|---|
| Term structure | 0.85× near/far |
| Historical volatility | 58% |
| Implied vs historical | 1.03× |
| Implied move | ±7.1% by 2026-09-04 |
| Implied move vs ATR | 0.48× |
| Skew | Flat (1.06×) |
| Call wall | 9.00 (+25.3% away) |
| Put wall | 7.00 (-2.6% away) |
| Gamma pin | 9.00 |
Takeaway Insuring against a move in this stock costs less for the next few weeks than for the next few months, which is the normal state of affairs and suggests no particular date is worrying anyone. Options traders are positioned for a move of around 7.1% in either direction by 2026-09-04.
Chain as at 2026-08-27. This is a risk read on whether a specific event is being priced — not a directional view.
Context & Methodthe record, and how it was builtTop ↑
Relative Rotation
Mixed Rotation Phase
Rotation health 30.0/100; Negative Rotation.
| Rotation health | 30.0 |
|---|---|
| Rotation strength | 56.4 |
| Leg | Quadrant | RS-Ratio | RS-Mom |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock vs sector | Weakening | 105.7 | 84.7 |
| Stock vs SPY | Weakening | 103.6 | 83.0 |
| Sector vs SPY | Lagging | 81.0 | 94.8 |
Direction of travel: South-West / deteriorating rotation
Position only. Brown Bear's RRG redesign programme is closed — five constructions, none beat an appropriate null — so this section describes where the name sits, and is not a signal.
News Headlines
- Loading headlines\u2026
Headlines are supplied by third-party feeds and are not written, ranked or interpreted by Brown Bear. They feed no score on this page.
Detailed Scoring
Positive signals
- Altman Z-score 10.87 (+6.0)
- Insider conviction score (+3.0)
- Gross margin quality: 38.0% (+1.8)
- ROIC improving by 10.2 pts (+3.0)
- FCF margin improving by 319830.2 pts (+2.0)
- High earnings quality (accrual ratio -0.234) (+4.0)
- Accrual ratio improving (-0.14 -> -0.23) (+2.0)
- Track 2: 20-day momentum acceleration 0.33 (+30.2)
- Track 2: ADX 25.7 and flat (+4.8)
- Track 2: Bollinger position 0.18 (+1.3)
Negative signals
- Track 2: weak MACD line/signal structure (-7.0)
- Track 2: negative MACD regime (-3.7)
- Track 2: MACD slope deteriorating (-2.3)
- Track 2: weak volume for momentum setup (0.62x average)
- Relative strength versus sector deteriorating
- Track 2: bearish DI spread (-16.0)
- Weak relative momentum rank (0.01)
- Track 2: price below EMA20 by 7.0%
- Track 2: EMA20 slope deteriorating -3.0%
- Track 2: RSI deterioration/overheating 32.1, 5-day change -24.0
- Track 2: weak VPT confirmation (-0.01)
- Track 2: price below EMA50 by 12.2%
- Track 2: EMA50 slope deteriorating -3.3%
- Weak Piotroski F-score (2/9)
- Gross margin improving by -12.7 pts (+-0.9)
- Track 2 structural exemption: structural score 11.9/100 below the 25 quality floor; this is an unowned speculative candidate, so the universal SELL gate was skipped and the Track 2 momentum/RRG grid was allowed to evaluate instead. Structural quality here is weak by design for this kind of candidate -- treat any resulting BUY as higher risk than a Track 1 signal.
Chase risk is not elevated for this name, so extension penalties are omitted from the negative signals above.