L

Loews Corporation ·NYSE·Financial Services
113.13 live · 2026-08-12 15:59

Some scores are at the bottom of their range

This score sits at the bottom of the 0–100 range. The underlying calculation was negative, so the displayed value is a floor, not a measurement of zero.

  • Tactical Score: displayed 0, underlying value -104.0
4.3%
Brown Bear Score
27.0%
Business Conviction Score
14.1%
Position Health Score
35.0%
Chase Risk
Daily closes

Daily closes · 1Y (252 sessions) · +19.9% · range 94.32–119.40

The Businesswhat the company reports

Business & cash flow

FCF / assets 3.1%
OCF / assets 3.8%
FCF / revenue 18.0%
Gross margin 36.3%
ROIC 3.2%
Forward P/E 39.0

FCF/assets and OCF/assets are the cash-flow measures Brown Bear's own testing found to survive; FCF/revenue is shown alongside for context. Assets are from the latest annual filing (FY2025).

Price vs Earnings growth

Price has run ahead of forward EPS growth by 84.4pp

Confidence 95.0/100

Takeaway Price has moved further than forward earnings growth currently justifies — worth weighing against the rest of the entry case.

Reported earnings

Next report 2026-11-02

Q2 23 revenue: 552.00mQ2 23 net income: 360.00mQ2 23 EPS: 1.58Q3 23 revenue: 537.00mQ3 23 net income: 253.00mQ3 23 EPS: 1.12Q3 23Q4 23 revenue: 700.00mQ4 23 net income: 446.00mQ4 23 EPS: 1.96Q1 24 revenue: 710.00mQ1 24 net income: 457.00mQ1 24 EPS: 2.05Q1 24Q2 24 revenue: 711.00mQ2 24 net income: 369.00mQ2 24 EPS: 1.67Q3 24 revenue: 683.00mQ3 24 net income: 401.00mQ3 24 EPS: 1.82Q3 24Q4 24 revenue: 789.00mQ4 24 net income: 187.00mQ4 24 EPS: 0.85Q1 25 revenue: 846.00mQ1 25 net income: 370.00mQ1 25 EPS: 1.74Q1 25Q2 25 revenue: 769.00mQ2 25 net income: 391.00mQ2 25 EPS: 1.87Q3 25 revenue: 732.00mQ3 25 net income: 504.00mQ3 25 EPS: 2.43Q3 25Q4 25 revenue: 827.00mQ4 25 net income: 402.00mQ4 25 EPS: 1.92Q1 26 revenue: 858.00mQ1 26 net income: 337.00mQ1 26 EPS: 1.63Q1 26

Revenue Net incomeEPS (GAAP) (0.85–2.43, own scale) Derived Q4

12 quarters to Q1 26. Revenue and net income share one scale, so the gap between them is the margin. The line is GAAP EPS — it spans every quarter shown, where the reported figure only goes back as far as the consensus feed does.

Quarter endingRevenueYoY Net incomeEPS (GAAP) EPS reportedvs consensus Filed
2026-03-31 858.00m +1.4% 337.00m 1.63 1.63 2026-05-04
2025-12-31 (derived) 827.00m +4.8% 402.00m 1.92 1.94 2026-02-10
2025-09-30 732.00m +7.2% 504.00m 2.43 2.43 2025-11-03
2025-06-30 769.00m +8.2% 391.00m 1.87 2025-08-04

Earnings response

Typical move around a filing ±1.8%
On an ordinary two days ±0.9% — filings move it 2.0× as much
Direction 7 up, 4 down over 11 filings
Revenue change and price reaction, by quarter
Q3 22 revenue +17.6% year on yearQ3 22 filed 2022-10-31: price -2.6%Q1 23 revenue +10.7% year on yearQ1 23 filed 2023-05-01: price +2.5%Q1 23Q2 23 revenue +9.3% year on yearQ2 23 filed 2023-07-31: price +1.2%Q3 23 revenue +7.4% year on yearQ3 23 filed 2023-10-30: price +1.9%Q3 23Q1 24 revenue +24.3% year on yearQ1 24 filed 2024-05-06: price +1.8%Q2 24 revenue +28.8% year on yearQ2 24 filed 2024-07-29: price +0.5%Q2 24Q3 24 revenue +27.2% year on yearQ3 24 filed 2024-11-04: price -1.1%Q1 25 revenue +19.2% year on yearQ1 25 filed 2025-05-05: price -1.5%Q1 25Q2 25 revenue +8.2% year on yearQ2 25 filed 2025-08-04: price +3.3%Q3 25 revenue +7.2% year on yearQ3 25 filed 2025-11-03: price +1.1%Q3 25Q1 26 revenue +1.4% year on yearQ1 26 filed 2026-05-04: price -4.9%

Revenue up year on year Revenue down Price move around the filing separate scales — a crossing means nothing

Quarter endingFiledRevenue YoY Move around filingNext 20 sessions vs SPY
2026-03-31 2026-05-04 +1.4% -4.9% -5.8%
2025-09-30 2025-11-03 +7.2% +1.1% +3.9%
2025-06-30 2025-08-04 +8.2% +3.3% +1.4%
2025-03-31 2025-05-05 +19.2% -1.5% -4.9%

Share count

Diluted shares over time

Diluted shares Return since the previous filing

Direction Shrinking — shares retired
Diluted shares 206.3M as at 2026-03-31
Change over 1 year -3.0%
Change over 3 years -11.7%
Public float $15.36bn as at 2025-06-30 (10-K)

The Pricewhat the chart is doingTop ↑

Price Levels

StrategyFair Value Anchor
Reference band 108.89 — 113.70
Protective stop 108.62 (Structure, 2.4% risk)
Support 109.74 (3 touches, 3.1% away)
Resistance 117.07 (3.5% away)

Takeaway The shares are nearer the floor than the ceiling: about 3.1% above 109.74, a price buyers have stepped in at before, and 3.5% below 117.07, where sellers have turned up before. That floor has held 3 times, which is how it was spotted. If someone bought at today's price and sold if it dropped through the level below, they would be about 2.4% out of pocket. That is all this figure means — an illustration of the risk, not a price to sell at.

Levels are computed from price structure. They describe where the engine locates support and extension — they are not targets, and not advice.

Ichimoku Cloud (Adaptive)

Daily cloudPrice BELOW the cloud | periods 5/15/29 (57% of classic 9/26/52)
LinesTenkan/Kijun BEAR (fresh down cross, 1d ago) | cloud twist BEAR (fresh down, 3d ago)
Cloud eventFresh down breakout 3d ago
Cloud thickness62% percentile
Chikou spanNot clear of price from 26 periods ago
Weekly cloudPrice ABOVE the weekly cloud (context only, not scored)

Takeaway The stock is trading below its cloud — a shaded band drawn from several of its own moving averages, currently 114.57 to 116.25. Being below it means the medium-term picture is pointing downwards, and that band is the first hurdle it would have to climb back through. Its shorter-term averages agree with that.

Trailing returns

21 days -1.2%
63 days +8.4%
126 days +2.9%
252 days +20.8%
Below 252d high5.3%

Trend context

PositionAt trend
ExtensionNormal
Trend slopeFlat
Direction of travelConverging back to trend

Takeaway The share price is close to the level its own longer-run trend suggests is fair, and that fair level is going sideways. The gap between the two has been closing. Neither is stretched far enough to stand out.

Volatility

State No recent compression
Current band width6.3% of price
Recent tightest6.0% (3 sessions ago, narrower than 76.0% of its history)
Expansion since1.05×
Band 112.08 — 119.37

Takeaway Lately this share price has been swinging around inside a range roughly 6% wide. That is normal for this stock, so there is nothing unusual to read into it either way.

Historical trends

0255075100Share price 112.52–119.402026-07-032026-08-12
Position Health Business Conviction Share price

History begins when the site started recording, not when the company listed, so a short line means a short record and nothing more.

Repair Pathway

  1. Nearest Trigger EMA50 reclaim +0.2% gap is improving · Broadly stable
  2. Trigger 2 MACD bullish crossover repair trigger repair engine identifies this as the nearest technical repair catalyst · Broadly stable
  3. Trigger 3 Relative momentum rank above 0.65 +0.05 rank relative momentum leadership is not yet strong enough for the next action tier · Broadly stable
  4. Trigger 4 ADX turns up from weak trend zone secondary repair secondary repair catalyst could add confirmation if the primary trigger develops · Improving
  5. Trigger 5 Volume confirmation above 1.5x +0.50x volume confirmation would improve confidence in the pathway · Broadly stable

Who's Tradingthe flow behind the priceTop ↑

Insider activity

ActivityNo filings in the window
Buy filings0
Sell filings0

Open-market Form 4 purchases and sales over the last 75 days, read from SEC EDGAR Form 4. Grants, option exercises, gifts and shares withheld for tax are excluded — they are compensation mechanics, not a decision to buy or sell. Reported Form 4 activity. Brown Bear tested insider cluster-buying as a return signal and rejected it as era-unstable; shown as fact, not signal.

Volume confirmation

Volume-price trend Below its signal line
Confirmation Marginal

No absorption or distribution event in the recent window.

Takeaway The heaviest trading has been happening on days when the price falls: when large numbers of shares change hands, the price has tended to go down rather than up. That tells you where the weight of trading has been. It does not tell you what happens next, and it is not a signal to sell.

Options Positioning

Binary-event risk flagged

L: binary-event risk suspected -- Term structure inverted (near 25% IV vs far 20% IV, ratio 1.23); Implied move 3.1% is 0.52x the ATR-expected 6.0% over 9d. Options market is pricing a discrete catalyst; technical breakout signals are unreliable until it resolves.

Implied volatility 25% near (9d) · 20% far (128d) — Term structure inverted — the market is pricing an event in the near window
Term structure 1.23× near/far
Historical volatility 14%
Implied vs historical 1.78× — Options are priced well above what the stock has actually done
Implied move ±3.1% by 2026-08-21 — Large relative to this stock's normal daily range
Implied move vs ATR 0.52×
Skew Call Skew (0.85×)
Call wall 135.00 (+19.3% away)
Put wall 55.00 (-51.4% away)
Gamma pin 55.00
  • Term structure inverted (near 25% IV vs far 20% IV, ratio 1.23)
  • Implied move 3.1% is 0.52x the ATR-expected 6.0% over 9d

Takeaway Insuring against a move in this stock costs more for the next few weeks than for the next few months. Traders usually pay up like that when they know something is coming soon — results, a court ruling, a regulatory decision. Options traders are positioned for a move of around 3.1% in either direction by 2026-08-21. The overall shape suggests they expect a one-off result that lands either well or badly, rather than a gradual drift.

Chain as at 2026-08-12. This is a risk read on whether a specific event is being priced — not a directional view.

Context & Methodthe record, and how it was builtTop ↑

Relative Rotation

ImprovingLeadingLaggingWeakeningvs sectorvs SPYsector vs SPYRS-Ratio →RS-Momentum →

Stock Rotation Headwind

Rotation health 4.5/100; Severe Rotation Headwind.

Rotation health 4.5
Rotation strength 86.4
LegQuadrantRS-RatioRS-Mom
Stock vs sector Lagging 77.8 79.5
Stock vs SPY Lagging 75.7 91.3
Sector vs SPY Lagging 76.4 91.0

Direction of travel: South-West / deteriorating rotation

Position only. Brown Bear's RRG redesign programme is closed — five constructions, none beat an appropriate null — so this section describes where the name sits, and is not a signal.

News Headlines

  1. Loading headlines\u2026

Headlines are supplied by third-party feeds and are not written, ranked or interpreted by Brown Bear. They feed no score on this page.

Detailed Scoring

Positive signals

  • Piotroski F-score 6/9 (+8.0)
  • Insider conviction score (+7.0)
  • Gross margin quality: 36.3% (+1.6)
  • FCF margin quality: 18.0% (+5.4)
  • High earnings quality (accrual ratio -0.019) (+1.0)
  • Track 2: relative momentum rank 0.60 (+3.3)
  • Track 2: EMA50 slope improving 0.7% (+1.7)
  • Track 2: Bollinger position 0.14 (+1.1)

Negative signals

  • Track 2: weak MACD histogram (-0.66)
  • Track 2: weak MACD line/signal structure (-12.0)
  • Track 2: MACD slope deteriorating (-5.0)
  • Track 2: weak volume for momentum setup (0.44x average)
  • Relative strength versus sector deteriorating
  • Track 2: negative 20-day momentum acceleration (-0.03)
  • Track 2: bearish DI spread (-5.4)
  • Track 2: weak/falling ADX (17.1, falling)
  • Track 2: Bearish MACD divergence
  • Track 2: price below EMA20 by 1.7%
  • Track 2: EMA20 slope deteriorating -0.5%
  • Track 2: MACD histogram deteriorating (-0.33)
  • Track 2: RSI deterioration/overheating 38.6, 5-day change -20.9
  • Track 2: weak VPT confirmation (-0.03)
  • Track 2: price below EMA50 by 0.2%
  • Below-average Altman Z-score (1.91)
  • Gross margin improving by -63.7 pts (+-1.0)
  • Track 2 structural exemption: structural score 22.0/100 below the 25 quality floor; this is an unowned speculative candidate, so the universal SELL gate was skipped and the Track 2 momentum/RRG grid was allowed to evaluate instead. Structural quality here is weak by design for this kind of candidate -- treat any resulting BUY as higher risk than a Track 1 signal.

Chase risk is not elevated for this name, so extension penalties are omitted from the negative signals above.