NCLH
Some scores are at the bottom of their range
This score sits at the bottom of the 0–100 range. The underlying calculation was negative, so the displayed value is a floor, not a measurement of zero.
- Tactical Score: displayed 0, underlying value -88.2
Daily closes · 1Y (252 sessions) · -21.9% · range 14.79–26.94
The Businesswhat the company reports
Business & cash flow
| FCF / assets | -5.2% |
|---|---|
| OCF / assets | 9.3% |
| FCF / revenue | 21.3% |
| Gross margin | 42.5% |
| ROIC | 8.1% |
| Forward P/E | 11.1 |
FCF/assets and OCF/assets are the cash-flow measures Brown Bear's own testing found to survive; FCF/revenue is shown alongside for context. Assets are from the latest annual filing (FY2025).
Price vs Earnings growth
Forward EPS growth has outpaced trailing price return by +24.3pp
Confidence 95.0/100
Drivers
| Forward EPS growth | +2.4% |
|---|---|
| Trailing price return (1y) | -21.9% |
| Forward P/E compression | +2.3% |
Figures
| Trailing EPS | 1.67 |
|---|---|
| Forward EPS | 1.71 |
| Trailing P/E | 11.33 |
| Forward P/E | 11.07 |
Revisions
Rapidly Deteriorating (-14.8%, 10 dates)
Takeaway Earnings growth is outpacing price — consistent with the stock not yet fully reflecting its improving forward estimates.
Reported earnings
Revenue Net incomeEPS (GAAP) (0.17–1.09, own scale) Derived Q4
12 quarters to Q1 18. Revenue and net income share one scale, so the gap between them is the margin. The line is GAAP EPS — it spans every quarter shown, where the reported figure only goes back as far as the consensus feed does.
| Quarter ending | Revenue | YoY | Net income | EPS (GAAP) | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-31 | 1.29bn | +12.4% | — | — | 2018-05-07 |
| 2017-12-31 (derived) | 1.25bn | +11.1% | — | — | 2018-02-27 |
| 2017-09-30 | 1.65bn | +11.2% | — | — | 2017-11-09 |
| 2017-06-30 | 1.34bn | +13.3% | — | — | 2017-08-09 |
| 2017-03-31 | 1.15bn | +6.8% | — | — | 2017-05-10 |
| 2016-12-31 (derived) | 1.13bn | +8.5% | — | — | 2017-02-27 |
| 2016-09-30 | 1.48bn | +15.6% | — | — | 2016-11-09 |
| 2016-06-30 | 1.19bn | +9.3% | — | — | 2016-08-09 |
| 2016-03-31 | 1.08bn | — | — | — | 2016-05-10 |
| 2015-12-31 (derived) | 1.04bn | — | 38.31m | 0.17 | 2016-02-29 |
| 2015-09-30 | 1.28bn | — | 251.79m | 1.09 | 2015-11-04 |
| 2015-06-30 | 1.09bn | — | 158.49m | 0.69 | 2015-08-07 |
Share count
Diluted shares Return since the previous filing
| Direction | Growing — shares issued |
|---|---|
| Diluted shares | 466.1M as at 2026-03-31 |
| Change over 1 year | +8.1% |
| Change over 3 years | +118.2% |
| Public float | $9.00bn as at 2025-06-30 (10-K) |
The Pricewhat the chart is doingTop ↑
Price Levels
| Strategy | Current Price Reasonable |
|---|---|
| Reference band | 18.64 — 19.11 |
| Protective stop | 18.05 (Structure, 4.4% risk) |
| Support | 18.44 (4 touches, 2.6% away) |
| Resistance | 20.81 (10.0% away) |
Takeaway The shares are nearer the floor than the ceiling: about 2.6% above 18.44, a price buyers have stepped in at before, and 10.0% below 20.81, where sellers have turned up before. That floor has held 4 times, which is how it was spotted. If someone bought at today's price and sold if it dropped through the level below, they would be about 4.4% out of pocket. That is all this figure means — an illustration of the risk, not a price to sell at.
Levels are computed from price structure. They describe where the engine locates support and extension — they are not targets, and not advice.
Ichimoku Cloud (Adaptive)
| Daily cloud | Price BELOW the cloud | periods 7/21/43 (82% of classic 9/26/52) |
|---|---|
| Lines | Tenkan/Kijun BULL | cloud twist BEAR |
| Cloud event | Fresh down breakout 4d ago |
| Cloud thickness | 24% percentile (thin — little structure to fight through) |
| Chikou span | Not clear of price from 26 periods ago |
| Weekly cloud | Price BELOW the weekly cloud (context only, not scored) |
Takeaway The stock is trading below its cloud — a shaded band drawn from several of its own moving averages, currently 19.61 to 19.82. Being below it means the medium-term picture is pointing downwards, and that band is the first hurdle it would have to climb back through. Its shorter-term averages point the other way, so this is a mixed reading rather than a clear one.
Trailing returns
| 21 days | -2.8% |
|---|---|
| 63 days | +18.3% |
| 126 days | -19.7% |
| 252 days | -20.3% |
| Below 252d high | 29.8% |
Trend context
| Position | At trend |
|---|---|
| Extension | Normal |
| Trend slope | Falling |
| Direction of travel | Holding its deviation |
Takeaway The share price is close to the level its own longer-run trend suggests is fair, and that fair level is drifting down. The gap between the two has been fairly steady. Neither is stretched far enough to stand out.
Volatility
| State | In a squeeze |
|---|---|
| Current band width | 14.9% of price |
| Recent tightest | 13.0% (5 sessions ago, narrower than 99.0% of its history) |
| Expansion since | 1.15× |
| Band | 18.03 — 20.93 |
Takeaway Lately this share price has been swinging around inside a range roughly 15% wide, and it recently went unusually quiet — calmer than it has been 99% of the time. When a stock goes quiet like this, its next move tends to look big by comparison. But quiet says nothing about which way it will go: Brown Bear tested calm-before-a-move as a reason to buy, and it did not work.
Historical trends
History begins when the site started recording, not when the company listed, so a short line means a short record and nothing more.
Repair Pathway
- Nearest Trigger MACD bullish crossover repair trigger repair engine identifies this as the nearest technical repair catalyst · Broadly stable
- Trigger 2 EMA50 reclaim +2.4% gap is improving · Broadly stable
- Trigger 3 ADX turns up from weak trend zone secondary repair secondary repair catalyst could add confirmation if the primary trigger develops · Deteriorating rapidly
- Trigger 4 EMA20 reclaim +2.6% gap is improving · Broadly stable
- Trigger 5 Bollinger recovery toward mid-band +0.14 band position price remains in the lower Bollinger zone; recovery toward mid-band would support repair · Broadly stable
Who's Tradingthe flow behind the priceTop ↑
Insider activity
| Activity | No filings in the window |
|---|---|
| Buy filings | 0 |
| Sell filings | 0 |
Open-market Form 4 purchases and sales over the last 75 days, read from SEC EDGAR Form 4. Grants, option exercises, gifts and shares withheld for tax are excluded — they are compensation mechanics, not a decision to buy or sell. Reported Form 4 activity. Brown Bear tested insider cluster-buying as a return signal and rejected it as era-unstable; shown as fact, not signal.
Volume confirmation
| Volume-price trend | Below its signal line |
|---|---|
| Confirmation | Marginal |
No absorption or distribution event in the recent window.
Takeaway The heaviest trading has been happening on days when the price falls: when large numbers of shares change hands, the price has tended to go down rather than up. That tells you where the weight of trading has been. It does not tell you what happens next, and it is not a signal to sell.
Options Positioning
No binary-event flag
NCLH: no binary-event flag. Near IV 41%, far IV 50% (ratio 0.82), implied move 5.2%.
| Implied volatility | 41% near (9d) · 50% far (128d) |
|---|---|
| Term structure | 0.82× near/far |
| Historical volatility | 58% |
| Implied vs historical | 0.71× |
| Implied move | ±5.2% by 2026-08-21 |
| Implied move vs ATR | 0.42× |
| Skew | Flat (1.04×) |
Takeaway Insuring against a move in this stock costs less for the next few weeks than for the next few months, which is the normal state of affairs and suggests no particular date is worrying anyone. Options traders are positioned for a move of around 5.2% in either direction by 2026-08-21.
Chain as at 2026-08-12. This is a risk read on whether a specific event is being priced — not a directional view.
Context & Methodthe record, and how it was builtTop ↑
Relative Rotation
Stock Rotation Headwind
Rotation health 32.1/100; Negative Rotation.
| Rotation health | 32.1 |
|---|---|
| Rotation strength | 83.9 |
| Leg | Quadrant | RS-Ratio | RS-Mom |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock vs sector | Lagging | 76.9 | 85.4 |
| Stock vs SPY | Lagging | 76.1 | 87.4 |
| Sector vs SPY | Leading | 112.5 | 121.1 |
Direction of travel: South-West / deteriorating rotation
Position only. Brown Bear's RRG redesign programme is closed — five constructions, none beat an appropriate null — so this section describes where the name sits, and is not a signal.
News Headlines
- Loading headlines\u2026
Headlines are supplied by third-party feeds and are not written, ranked or interpreted by Brown Bear. They feed no score on this page.
Detailed Scoring
Positive signals
- Piotroski F-score 5/9 (+5.0)
- Insider conviction score (+11.0)
- Gross margin quality: 42.5% (+2.2)
- ROIC quality: 8.1% (+0.9)
- FCF margin quality: 21.3% (+6.0)
- FCF margin improving by -0.4 pts (+-1.0)
- High earnings quality (accrual ratio -0.074) (+2.0)
- Accrual ratio improving (-0.06 -> -0.07) (+2.0)
- Track 2: bullish DI spread 1.2 (+3.0)
- Track 2: Bollinger position 0.31 (+2.5)
Negative signals
- Track 2: weak MACD histogram (-0.12)
- Track 2: weak MACD line/signal structure (-15.0)
- Track 2: negative MACD regime (-8.0)
- Track 2: MACD slope deteriorating (-5.0)
- Track 2: weak volume for momentum setup (0.48x average)
- Relative strength versus sector deteriorating
- Track 2: weak/falling ADX (11.8, falling)
- Weak relative momentum rank (0.13)
- Track 2: price below EMA20 by 2.5%
- Track 2: EMA20 slope deteriorating -1.6%
- Track 2: RSI deterioration/overheating 51.2, 5-day change -3.2
- Track 2: weak VPT confirmation (-0.04)
- Track 2: price below EMA50 by 2.4%
- Track 2: EMA50 slope deteriorating -0.5%
- Below-average Altman Z-score (0.60)
- ROIC improving by -2.6 pts (+-2.0)
- Track 2 structural exemption: Z-Score 0.60 below the 1.8 insolvency-risk floor and structural score 11.1/100 below the 25 quality floor; this is an unowned speculative candidate, so the universal SELL gate was skipped and the Track 2 momentum/RRG grid was allowed to evaluate instead. Structural quality here is weak by design for this kind of candidate -- treat any resulting BUY as higher risk than a Track 1 signal.
Chase risk is not elevated for this name, so extension penalties are omitted from the negative signals above.