NVO

Novo Nordisk ·NYSE·Healthcare
46.29 live · 2026-08-27 15:00

Some scores are at the bottom of their range

This score sits at the bottom of the 0–100 range. The underlying calculation was negative, so the displayed value is a floor, not a measurement of zero.

  • Tactical Score: displayed 0, underlying value -11.9
1.8%
Brown Bear Score
10.3%
Business Conviction Score
20.4%
Position Health Score
0.0%
Chase Risk
Daily closes

Daily closes · 1Y (252 sessions) · -14.7% · range 35.29–63.98

Score trends appear once the scores have been recorded on more than one trading day.

The Businesswhat the company reports

Business & cash flow

FCF / revenue
Gross margin 0.0%
ROIC 0.0%
Forward P/E 13.7

No annual filing with both total assets and a cash-flow figure is cached for this name, so neither validated measure can be computed. FCF/revenue is shown instead, which is not the validated measure.

Price vs Earnings growth

Forward EPS growth has outpaced trailing price return by +1.0pp

Confidence 95.0/100

Takeaway Price and forward earnings growth are broadly in step; no strong valuation lean either way.

The Pricewhat the chart is doingTop ↑

Price Levels

StrategyFair Value Anchor
Reference band 45.94 — 47.43
Protective stop 44.64 (Structure, 4.4% risk)
Support 45.14 (3 touches, 4.5% away)
Resistance 47.47 (0.6% away)

Takeaway The shares are nearer the ceiling than the floor: about 0.6% below 47.47, where sellers have turned up before, and 4.5% above 45.14, where buyers have stepped in before. That floor has held 3 times, which is how it was spotted. If someone bought at today's price and sold if it dropped through the level below, they would be about 4.4% out of pocket. That is all this figure means — an illustration of the risk, not a price to sell at.

Levels are computed from price structure. They describe where the engine locates support and extension — they are not targets, and not advice.

Ichimoku Cloud (Adaptive)

Daily cloudPrice BELOW the cloud | periods 8/24/47 (91% of classic 9/26/52)
LinesTenkan/Kijun BEAR | cloud twist BEAR (fresh down, 0d ago)
Cloud eventFresh down breakout 0d ago
Cloud thickness1% percentile (thin — little structure to fight through)
Chikou spanNot clear of price from 26 periods ago
Weekly cloudPrice BELOW the weekly cloud (context only, not scored)

Takeaway The stock is trading below its cloud — a shaded band drawn from several of its own moving averages, currently 47.89 to 47.90. Being below it means the medium-term picture is pointing downwards, and that band is the first hurdle it would have to climb back through. Its shorter-term averages agree with that.

Trailing returns

21 days -7.4%
63 days +5.9%
126 days +23.7%
252 days -16.2%
Below 252d high26.2%

Trend context

PositionAt trend
ExtensionNormal
Trend slopeFlat
Direction of travelHolding its deviation

Takeaway The share price is close to the level its own longer-run trend suggests is fair, and that fair level is going sideways. The gap between the two has been fairly steady. Neither is stretched far enough to stand out.

Volatility

State No recent compression
Current band width13.4% of price
Recent tightest13.4% (0 sessions ago, narrower than 62.0% of its history)
Expansion since1.00×
Band 43.59 — 49.86

Takeaway Lately this share price has been swinging around inside a range roughly 13% wide. That is normal for this stock, so there is nothing unusual to read into it either way.

Repair Pathway

  1. Nearest Trigger MACD repair streak continuation 5 improving bars MACD histogram has improved for 5 consecutive sessions · Broadly stable
  2. Trigger 2 Positive 20-day momentum acceleration repair trigger repair engine identifies this as the nearest technical repair catalyst · Broadly stable
  3. Trigger 3 Relative momentum rank back above 0.45 secondary repair secondary repair catalyst could add confirmation if the primary trigger develops · Broadly stable
  4. Trigger 4 Volume confirmation above 1.5x +0.50x volume confirmation would improve confidence in the pathway · Broadly stable
  5. Trigger 5 EMA20 continuation hold already above Track 2 pathway: price is above a rising EMA20; sustained hold would support momentum continuation · Broadly stable

Who's Tradingthe flow behind the priceTop ↑

Insider activity

ActivityNo filings in the window
Buy filings0
Sell filings0

Open-market Form 4 purchases and sales over the last 75 days, read from SEC EDGAR Form 4. Grants, option exercises, gifts and shares withheld for tax are excluded — they are compensation mechanics, not a decision to buy or sell. Reported Form 4 activity. Brown Bear tested insider cluster-buying as a return signal and rejected it as era-unstable; shown as fact, not signal.

Volume confirmation

Volume-price trend Below its signal line
Confirmation Marginal

No absorption or distribution event in the recent window.

Takeaway The heaviest trading has been happening on days when the price falls: when large numbers of shares change hands, the price has tended to go down rather than up. That tells you where the weight of trading has been. It does not tell you what happens next, and it is not a signal to sell.

Options Positioning

No binary-event flag

NVO: no binary-event flag. Near IV 32%, far IV 39% (ratio 0.82), implied move 3.7%.

Implied volatility 32% near (8d) · 39% far (85d)
Term structure 0.82× near/far
Historical volatility 48%
Implied vs historical 0.66×
Implied move ±3.8% by 2026-09-04
Implied move vs ATR 0.62×
Skew Put Skew (1.35×)
Call wall 50.00 (+8.0% away)
Put wall 45.00 (-2.8% away)
Gamma pin 50.00

Takeaway Insuring against a move in this stock costs less for the next few weeks than for the next few months, which is the normal state of affairs and suggests no particular date is worrying anyone. Options traders are positioned for a move of around 3.8% in either direction by 2026-09-04.

Chain as at 2026-08-27. This is a risk read on whether a specific event is being priced — not a directional view.

Context & Methodthe record, and how it was builtTop ↑

Relative Rotation

ImprovingLeadingLaggingWeakeningvs sectorvs SPYsector vs SPYRS-Ratio →RS-Momentum →

Mixed Rotation Phase

Rotation health 85.6/100; Strong Rotation Tailwind.

Rotation health 85.6
Rotation strength 63.8
LegQuadrantRS-RatioRS-Mom
Stock vs sector Improving 92.5 113.6
Stock vs SPY Improving 96.7 114.2
Sector vs SPY Leading 113.2 117.8

Direction of travel: East / relative trend strengthening

Position only. Brown Bear's RRG redesign programme is closed — five constructions, none beat an appropriate null — so this section describes where the name sits, and is not a signal.

News Headlines

  1. Loading headlines\u2026

Headlines are supplied by third-party feeds and are not written, ranked or interpreted by Brown Bear. They feed no score on this page.

Detailed Scoring

Positive signals

  • Piotroski F-score 5/9 (+5.0)
  • Altman Z-score 3.00 (+3.0)
  • High earnings quality (accrual ratio 0.000) (+1.0)
  • Track 2: MACD histogram state (0.17) (+2.9)
  • Track 2: MACD line/signal trend quality (+10.5)
  • Track 2: MACD slope expanding (+2.9)
  • Track 2: relative strength trend improving (+9.5)
  • Track 2: bullish DI spread 15.1 (+7.6)
  • Track 2: price above EMA20 by 0.2% (+0.1)
  • Track 2: EMA20 slope expanding 0.2% (+0.3)
  • Track 2: MACD histogram acceleration 0.36 (+2.3)
  • Track 2: RSI trend quality 55.4, 5-day change +21.6 (+11.4)
  • Track 2: price above EMA50 by 0.5% (+0.2)
  • Track 2: constructive pullback within uptrend (+10)
  • Track 2: Bollinger position 0.57 (+4.4)

Negative signals

  • Underperforming sector over 20 days
  • Track 2: negative MACD regime (-3.7)
  • Track 2: weak volume for momentum setup (0.60x average)
  • Track 2: negative 20-day momentum acceleration (-0.16)
  • Track 2: weak/falling ADX (28.7, falling)
  • Weak relative momentum rank (0.16)
  • Track 2: weak VPT confirmation (-0.00)
  • Track 2: EMA50 slope deteriorating -0.4%
  • FCF margin unavailable: revenue missing from fundamentals cache
  • Track 2 structural exemption: structural score 9.0/100 below the 25 quality floor; this is an unowned speculative candidate, so the universal SELL gate was skipped and the Track 2 momentum/RRG grid was allowed to evaluate instead. Structural quality here is weak by design for this kind of candidate -- treat any resulting BUY as higher risk than a Track 1 signal.

Chase risk is not elevated for this name, so extension penalties are omitted from the negative signals above.