S
Some scores are at the bottom of their range
This score sits at the bottom of the 0–100 range. The underlying calculation was negative, so the displayed value is a floor, not a measurement of zero.
- Tactical Score: displayed 0, underlying value -1.3
Daily closes · 1Y (252 sessions) · +24.9% · range 11.94–23.84
The Businesswhat the company reports
Business & cash flow
| FCF / assets | 3.1% |
|---|---|
| OCF / assets | 3.1% |
| FCF / revenue | 7.7% |
| Gross margin | 73.2% |
| ROIC | -18.4% |
| Forward P/E | 41.6 |
FCF/assets and OCF/assets are the cash-flow measures Brown Bear's own testing found to survive; FCF/revenue is shown alongside for context. Assets are from the latest annual filing (FY2026).
Price vs Earnings growth
Trailing EPS is negative (-0.97), so a growth percentage does not exist — forward EPS of 0.49 implies a swing from loss to profit
Confidence 35.0/100
Drivers
| Trailing price return (1y) | +24.9% |
|---|
Figures
| Trailing EPS | -0.97 |
|---|---|
| Forward EPS | 0.49 |
| Forward P/E | 41.63 |
Revisions
Stable (-0.2%, 10 dates)
Takeaway Low data confidence (limited analyst coverage) — treat this section as informational only.
Reported earnings
Revenue Net incomeEPS (GAAP) (-0.63–-0.18, own scale) Derived Q4
12 quarters to Q2 26. Revenue and net income share one scale, so the gap between them is the margin. The baseline is zero — bars below it are losses. The line is GAAP EPS — it spans every quarter shown, where the reported figure only goes back as far as the consensus feed does.
| Quarter ending | Revenue | YoY | Net income | EPS (GAAP) | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | 276.66m | +20.8% | -76.16m | -0.23 | 2026-05-28 |
| 2026-01-31 (derived) | 271.15m | +20.2% | -110.23m | -0.33 | 2026-03-19 |
| 2025-10-31 | 258.91m | +22.9% | -60.29m | -0.18 | 2025-12-04 |
| 2025-07-31 | 242.18m | +21.7% | -72.02m | -0.22 | 2025-08-28 |
| 2025-04-30 | 229.03m | +22.9% | -208.19m | -0.63 | 2025-05-28 |
| 2025-01-31 (derived) | 225.52m | +29.5% | -70.79m | -0.22 | 2025-03-26 |
| 2024-10-31 | 210.65m | +28.3% | -78.36m | -0.25 | 2024-12-04 |
| 2024-07-31 | 198.94m | +33.1% | -69.18m | -0.22 | 2024-08-27 |
| 2024-04-30 | 186.35m | — | -70.11m | -0.23 | 2024-05-30 |
| 2024-01-31 (derived) | 174.18m | — | -71.98m | -0.24 | 2024-03-27 |
| 2023-10-31 | 164.16m | — | -70.30m | -0.24 | 2023-12-05 |
| 2023-07-31 | 149.42m | — | -89.54m | -0.31 | 2023-08-31 |
Share count
Diluted shares Return since the previous filing
| Direction | Growing — shares issued |
|---|---|
| Diluted shares | 337.0M as at 2026-04-30 |
| Change over 1 year | +2.8% |
| Change over 3 years | +16.9% |
| Public float | $5.10bn as at 2025-07-31 (10-K) |
History before 2022-04-30 is not shown. The share count jumps at that date by a ratio no ordinary issuance produces — a split whose factor is not in Brown Bear's split store — so earlier figures are on a different basis and cannot be compared with today's.
The Pricewhat the chart is doingTop ↑
Price Levels
| Strategy | Fair Value Anchor |
|---|---|
| Reference band | 18.86 — 20.61 |
| Protective stop | 17.41 (Atr, 11.8% risk) |
| Support | 17.26 (2 touches, 18.8% away) |
| Resistance | 23.95 (16.8% away) |
Takeaway The shares are nearer the ceiling than the floor: about 16.8% below 23.95, where sellers have turned up before, and 18.8% above 17.26, where buyers have stepped in before. That floor has held 2 times, which is how it was spotted. If someone bought at today's price and sold if it dropped through the level below, they would be about 11.8% out of pocket. That is all this figure means — an illustration of the risk, not a price to sell at.
Levels are computed from price structure. They describe where the engine locates support and extension — they are not targets, and not advice.
Ichimoku Cloud (Adaptive)
| Daily cloud | Price BELOW the cloud | periods 6/18/37 (71% of classic 9/26/52) |
|---|---|
| Lines | Tenkan/Kijun BULL | cloud twist BULL |
| Cloud event | Fresh down breakout 1d ago |
| Cloud thickness | 30% percentile (thin — little structure to fight through) |
| Chikou span | Above price from 26 periods ago |
| Weekly cloud | Price ABOVE the weekly cloud (context only, not scored) |
Takeaway The stock is trading below its cloud — a shaded band drawn from several of its own moving averages, currently 20.57 to 21.18. Being below it means the medium-term picture is pointing downwards, and that band is the first hurdle it would have to climb back through. Its shorter-term averages point the other way, so this is a mixed reading rather than a clear one.
Trailing returns
| 21 days | +11.8% |
|---|---|
| 63 days | +14.3% |
| 126 days | +58.7% |
| 252 days | +23.7% |
| Below 252d high | 14.0% |
Trend context
| Position | Above trend |
|---|---|
| Extension | Normal |
| Trend slope | Rising |
| Direction of travel | Converging back to trend |
Takeaway The share price is above the level its own longer-run trend suggests is fair, and that fair level is climbing. The gap between the two has been closing. Neither is stretched far enough to stand out.
Volatility
| State | No recent compression |
|---|---|
| Current band width | 24.4% of price |
| Recent tightest | 24.4% (0 sessions ago, narrower than 44.0% of its history) |
| Expansion since | 1.00× |
| Band | 18.65 — 23.85 |
Takeaway Lately this share price has been swinging around inside a range roughly 24% wide. That is normal for this stock, so there is nothing unusual to read into it either way.
Historical trends
History begins when the site started recording, not when the company listed, so a short line means a short record and nothing more.
Repair Pathway
- Nearest Trigger MACD bullish crossover repair trigger repair engine identifies this as the nearest technical repair catalyst · Broadly stable
- Trigger 2 RSI recovery above 50 secondary repair secondary repair catalyst could add confirmation if the primary trigger develops · Deteriorating
- Trigger 3 Relative momentum leadership holds already satisfied Track 2 pathway: relative momentum leadership is already present; maintaining it supports upgrade pressure · Broadly stable
- Trigger 4 Volume confirmation above 1.5x +0.50x volume confirmation would improve confidence in the pathway · Broadly stable
- Trigger 5 EMA20 reclaim +1.8% gap is broadly stable · Broadly stable
Who's Tradingthe flow behind the priceTop ↑
Insider activity
| Activity | Insider selling |
|---|---|
| Buy filings | 0 |
| Sell filings | 10 |
| Shares sold | 237,913 |
| Value sold | $4.5m |
| Latest sell | 2026-08-06 |
| Filed | Insider | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-06 | Sold Pinczuk Ana G.President Product & Technology | 6,230 | $125,142 |
| 2026-08-06 | Sold PADGETT BARRY L.President and COO | 9,778 | $196,460 |
| 2026-08-06 | Sold Conder Keenan MichaelChief Legal Officer & Sec'y | 26,374 | $529,590 |
| 2026-08-06 | Sold TOMASELLO ROBINChief Accounting Officer | 5,467 | $109,799 |
| 2026-08-06 | Sold Weingarten TomerPresident, CEO | 53,811 | $1,080,525 |
| 2026-07-31 | Sold Weingarten TomerPresident, CEO | 57,941 | $1,086,133 |
Open-market Form 4 purchases and sales over the last 75 days, read from SEC EDGAR Form 4. Grants, option exercises, gifts and shares withheld for tax are excluded — they are compensation mechanics, not a decision to buy or sell. Reported Form 4 activity. Brown Bear tested insider cluster-buying as a return signal and rejected it as era-unstable; shown as fact, not signal.
Volume confirmation
| Volume-price trend | Below its signal line |
|---|---|
| Confirmation | Marginal |
No absorption or distribution event in the recent window.
Takeaway The heaviest trading has been happening on days when the price falls: when large numbers of shares change hands, the price has tended to go down rather than up. That tells you where the weight of trading has been. It does not tell you what happens next, and it is not a signal to sell.
Options Positioning
No meaningful positions — the chain was read and nothing in it stands out as pricing a specific event.
Context & Methodthe record, and how it was builtTop ↑
Relative Rotation
Stock Rotation Headwind
Rotation health 4.3/100; Severe Rotation Headwind.
| Rotation health | 4.3 |
|---|---|
| Rotation strength | 99.2 |
| Leg | Quadrant | RS-Ratio | RS-Mom |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock vs sector | Lagging | 86.5 | 81.6 |
| Stock vs SPY | Lagging | 86.5 | 81.6 |
Direction of travel: South-West / deteriorating rotation
Position only. Brown Bear's RRG redesign programme is closed — five constructions, none beat an appropriate null — so this section describes where the name sits, and is not a signal.
News Headlines
- Loading headlines\u2026
Headlines are supplied by third-party feeds and are not written, ranked or interpreted by Brown Bear. They feed no score on this page.
Detailed Scoring
Positive signals
- Altman Z-score 4.54 (+5.0)
- Insider conviction score (+5.0)
- Gross margin quality: 73.2% (+5.3)
- FCF margin quality: 7.7% (+2.3)
- FCF margin improving by 3.5 pts (+1.0)
- High earnings quality (accrual ratio -0.216) (+4.0)
- Accrual ratio improving (-0.13 -> -0.22) (+2.0)
- Relative Strength 8.2% vs sector: OUTPERFORMING (+10.0)
- Track 2: relative strength trend improving (+10.0)
- Track 2: ADX 30.7 and flat (+12.0)
- Track 2: relative momentum rank 0.67 (+5.5)
- Track 2: price above EMA50 by 5.3% (+4.3)
- Track 2: EMA50 slope improving 5.4% (+6.0)
- Track 2: Bollinger position 0.36 (+2.9)
Negative signals
- Track 2: weak MACD histogram (-0.33)
- Track 2: weak MACD line/signal structure (-12.0)
- Track 2: MACD slope deteriorating (-5.0)
- Track 2: weak volume for momentum setup (0.84x average)
- Track 2: bearish DI spread (-1.0)
- Track 2: price below EMA20 by 1.8%
- Track 2: EMA20 slope deteriorating -0.5%
- Track 2: MACD histogram deteriorating (-0.33)
- Track 2: RSI deterioration/overheating 48.6, 5-day change -15.8
- Track 2: weak VPT confirmation (-0.03)
- Gross margin improving by -1.1 pts (+-1.0)
- ROIC improving by -0.0 pts (+-2.0)
- Track 2 structural exemption: structural score 21.6/100 below the 25 quality floor; this is an unowned speculative candidate, so the universal SELL gate was skipped and the Track 2 momentum/RRG grid was allowed to evaluate instead. Structural quality here is weak by design for this kind of candidate -- treat any resulting BUY as higher risk than a Track 1 signal.
Chase risk is not elevated for this name, so extension penalties are omitted from the negative signals above.