SIDU
Structural scoring is not meaningful for this business
Structural scoring uses gross margin, free cash flow and Altman Z — measures built for operating companies. For banks, insurers and asset managers they produce artifacts, because the cash-flow statement is dominated by lending and deposit flows rather than operations. Treat the structural and composite figures below as not comparable with other sectors, in either direction.
- Reported free cash flow is far outside the range an operating business can show, indicating balance-sheet rather than operating flows
Daily closes · 1Y (252 sessions) · +81.5% · range 0.63–6.20
The Businesswhat the company reports
Business & cash flow
| FCF / assets | -39.8% |
|---|---|
| OCF / assets | -27.5% |
| FCF / revenue | -536.5% |
| Gross margin | -166.9% |
| ROIC | -57.5% |
| Forward P/E | -9.4 |
FCF/assets and OCF/assets are the cash-flow measures Brown Bear's own testing found to survive; FCF/revenue is shown alongside for context. Assets are from the latest annual filing (FY2025).
Price vs Earnings growth
Insufficient data to compare price against forward earnings growth
Confidence 25.0/100
Drivers
| Trailing price return (1y) | +81.5% |
|---|
Figures
| Forward P/E | -9.38 |
|---|
Takeaway Low data confidence (limited analyst coverage) — treat this section as informational only.
Reported earnings
Revenue Net incomeEPS (GAAP) (-11.58–-0.05, own scale) Derived Q4
12 quarters to Q1 26. Revenue and net income share one scale, so the gap between them is the margin. The baseline is zero — bars below it are losses. The line is GAAP EPS — it spans every quarter shown, where the reported figure only goes back as far as the consensus feed does.
| Quarter ending | Revenue | YoY | Net income | EPS (GAAP) | EPS reported | vs consensus | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-31 | 250.16k | +55.7% | -5.21m | -0.08 | -0.08 | — | 2026-05-15 |
| 2025-12-31 (derived) | 365.99k | — | -11.40m | -0.46 | — | — | 2026-04-01 |
| 2025-09-30 | 559.11k | -68.2% | -6.03m | -0.24 | — | — | 2025-11-14 |
| 2025-06-30 | 691.07k | -17.2% | -5.63m | -0.31 | — | — | 2025-08-14 |
| 2025-03-31 | 160.70k | -81.0% | -6.41m | -0.35 | — | — | 2025-05-15 |
| 2024-09-30 | 1.76m | +130.5% | -3.90m | -0.93 | — | — | 2024-11-14 |
| 2024-06-30 | 834.80k | -29.0% | -4.14m | -0.99 | — | — | 2024-08-19 |
| 2024-03-31 | 845.11k | -55.9% | -3.81m | -1.40 | — | — | 2024-05-20 |
| 2023-12-31 (derived) | 1.16m | — | -3.30m | -5.33 | — | — | 2024-03-27 |
| 2023-09-30 | 762.23k | — | -4.08m | -0.05 | -0.05 | -22.5% | 2023-11-14 |
| 2023-06-30 | 1.18m | — | -3.50m | -0.07 | -7.00 | -14.4% | 2023-08-14 |
| 2023-03-31 | 1.91m | — | -3.44m | -11.58 | -12.00 | -47.1% | 2023-05-12 |
The Pricewhat the chart is doingTop ↑
Price Levels
| Strategy | Current Price Reasonable |
|---|---|
| Reference band | 2.22 — 2.27 |
| Protective stop | 1.90 (Structure, 15.5% risk) |
| Support | 1.99 (3 touches, 12.9% away) |
| Resistance | 2.31 (2.7% away) |
Takeaway The shares are nearer the ceiling than the floor: about 2.7% below 2.31, where sellers have turned up before, and 12.9% above 1.99, where buyers have stepped in before. That floor has held 3 times, which is how it was spotted. If someone bought at today's price and sold if it dropped through the level below, they would be about 15.5% out of pocket. That is all this figure means — an illustration of the risk, not a price to sell at.
Levels are computed from price structure. They describe where the engine locates support and extension — they are not targets, and not advice.
Ichimoku Cloud (Adaptive)
| Daily cloud | Price INSIDE the cloud | periods 9/25/50 (96% of classic 9/26/52) |
|---|---|
| Lines | Tenkan/Kijun BULL | cloud twist BEAR |
| Cloud thickness | 42% percentile |
| Chikou span | Above price from 26 periods ago |
| Weekly cloud | Price BELOW the weekly cloud (context only, not scored) |
Takeaway The stock is trading inside its cloud — a shaded band drawn from several of its own moving averages, currently 2.20 to 2.56. Inside the band those averages disagree with each other, so the indicator is not saying much either way. Its shorter-term averages point the other way, so this is a mixed reading rather than a clear one.
Trailing returns
| 21 days | +26.8% |
|---|---|
| 63 days | -63.0% |
| 126 days | +8.7% |
| 252 days | +86.0% |
| Below 252d high | 63.7% |
Trend context
| Position | At trend |
|---|---|
| Extension | Normal |
| Trend slope | Falling |
| Direction of travel | Converging back to trend |
Takeaway The share price is close to the level its own longer-run trend suggests is fair, and that fair level is drifting down. The gap between the two has been closing. Neither is stretched far enough to stand out.
Volatility
| State | In a squeeze |
|---|---|
| Current band width | 41.8% of price |
| Recent tightest | 41.8% (0 sessions ago, narrower than 80.0% of its history) |
| Expansion since | 1.00× |
| Band | 1.80 — 2.76 |
Takeaway Lately this share price has been swinging around inside a range roughly 42% wide, and it recently went unusually quiet — calmer than it has been 80% of the time. When a stock goes quiet like this, its next move tends to look big by comparison. But quiet says nothing about which way it will go: Brown Bear tested calm-before-a-move as a reason to buy, and it did not work.
Historical trends
History begins when the site started recording, not when the company listed, so a short line means a short record and nothing more.
Repair Pathway
- Nearest Trigger Relative momentum leadership holds already satisfied Track 2 pathway: relative momentum leadership is already present; maintaining it supports upgrade pressure · Broadly stable
- Trigger 2 EMA20 reclaim +2.5% gap is improving · Broadly stable
- Trigger 3 Volume confirmation above 1.5x +0.50x volume confirmation would improve confidence in the pathway · Broadly stable
- Trigger 4 MACD histogram acceleration turns positive repair trigger repair engine identifies this as the nearest technical repair catalyst · Broadly stable
- Trigger 5 Reclaim EMA20 secondary repair secondary repair catalyst could add confirmation if the primary trigger develops · Broadly stable
Who's Tradingthe flow behind the priceTop ↑
Insider activity
| Activity | No filings in the window |
|---|---|
| Buy filings | 0 |
| Sell filings | 0 |
Open-market Form 4 purchases and sales over the last 75 days, read from SEC EDGAR Form 4. Grants, option exercises, gifts and shares withheld for tax are excluded — they are compensation mechanics, not a decision to buy or sell. Reported Form 4 activity. Brown Bear tested insider cluster-buying as a return signal and rejected it as era-unstable; shown as fact, not signal.
Volume confirmation
| Volume-price trend | Above its signal line |
|---|---|
| Confirmation | Marginal |
No absorption or distribution event in the recent window.
Takeaway Slightly more shares change hands on rising days than on falling ones, but the gap is too small to read anything into.
Options Positioning
no listed options chain
Context & Methodthe record, and how it was builtTop ↑
Relative Rotation
Mixed Rotation Phase
Rotation health 46.7/100; Mixed Rotation.
| Rotation health | 46.7 |
|---|---|
| Rotation strength | 47.7 |
| Leg | Quadrant | RS-Ratio | RS-Mom |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock vs sector | Weakening | 110.0 | 87.8 |
| Stock vs SPY | Weakening | 110.0 | 87.8 |
Direction of travel: South-West / deteriorating rotation
Position only. Brown Bear's RRG redesign programme is closed — five constructions, none beat an appropriate null — so this section describes where the name sits, and is not a signal.
News Headlines
- Loading headlines\u2026
Headlines are supplied by third-party feeds and are not written, ranked or interpreted by Brown Bear. They feed no score on this page.
Detailed Scoring
Positive signals
- Altman Z-score 6.17 (+6.0)
- ROIC improving by 11.4 pts (+3.0)
- FCF margin improving by -197.8 pts (+-1.0)
- High earnings quality (accrual ratio -0.171) (+3.0)
- Accrual ratio improving (-0.05 -> -0.17) (+2.0)
- Relative Strength 19.0% vs sector: OUTPERFORMING (+10.0)
- Track 2: MACD line/signal trend quality (+10.0)
- Track 2: relative strength trend improving (+10.0)
- Track 2: 20-day momentum acceleration 0.74 (+20.0)
- Track 2: bullish DI spread 4.2 (+3.0)
- Track 2: ADX 32.0 and flat (+12.0)
- Track 2: relative momentum rank 0.95 (+14.9)
- Track 2: Bollinger position 0.47 (+3.7)
Negative signals
- Track 2: weak volume for momentum setup (0.46x average)
- Track 2: Bearish MACD divergence
- Track 2: price below EMA20 by 2.4%
- Track 2: EMA20 slope deteriorating -0.6%
- Track 2: RSI deterioration/overheating 56.3, 5-day change -12.2
- Track 2: weak VPT confirmation (0.00)
- Track 2: price below EMA50 by 9.7%
- Track 2: EMA50 slope deteriorating -2.0%
- Gross margin improving by -135.4 pts (+-1.0)
- Track 2 structural exemption: structural score 12.0/100 below the 25 quality floor; this is an unowned speculative candidate, so the universal SELL gate was skipped and the Track 2 momentum/RRG grid was allowed to evaluate instead. Structural quality here is weak by design for this kind of candidate -- treat any resulting BUY as higher risk than a Track 1 signal.
Chase risk is not elevated for this name, so extension penalties are omitted from the negative signals above.